Which Generative AIs are the best for literature search and writing aid?

Internet changed how we live. Google serach changed how we live. And now, generative AIs have changed how we work (writing papers or writing programming codes). Here is a list of some generative AIs, with some reviews taken from SNS, that helps you in writing papers. The criteria for the best AI tools for writing is if it can properly spot most specific literature that we need when we wirte. In that sense, ChatGPT may be the worst. You can check the performance of eacy AI engine by seeing if they can locate your papers that you published in your field.

  1. ChatGPT.com
  2. Claude.ai 
  3. Consensus.app 
  4. Elicit.com
  5. Gemini
  6. Insight: Empowering Medical Research
    1. AI in Academia: Research and Writing Tools to Reduce the Struggle The Struggling Scientists チャンネル登録者数 2170人 https://youtu.be/l1wfwprE_mQ?si=DHw2GewQ5cxeypqB&t=663
  7. jenni.ai
    1. I thought ChatGPT was a good writing assistant. But when I found Jenni AI – It blew my mind. It’s 10x more advanced than I thought. Angry Tom @AngryTomtweets 10:25 PM · Oct 18, 2023 · 85.4K Views
  8. Perplixity
  9. Samwell.ai
  10. SciSpace.com AI Writer
  11. Scite.ai A literature search tool, key words-based.

jenni.ai

Query: How do existing professional sociological frameworks for occupational establishment apply to the emerging field of research management and administration?

The Applicability of Sociological Frameworks to Research Management and Administration

Introduction

The professionalization of research management and administration represents a notable shift in the landscape of academic and scientific institutions, demanding a critical examination of its occupational establishment through established sociological frameworks (Pulver et al., 2018). Research management and administration, as a distinct field, is gaining recognition, necessitating a deeper understanding of its dynamics, roles, and impact within the broader research ecosystem (Sandiford & Divers, 2011). Existing sociological frameworks offer valuable lenses through which we can analyze the occupational trajectory of research management and administration, providing insights into its professionalization, status, and influence within the academic sphere (Burchett et al., 2011; Partelow, 2023; Yadav et al., 2013).

Applying Sociological Frameworks

Applying sociological frameworks to research management and administration necessitates an examination of the alignment between organizational objectives and administrative structures, to ensure effective implementation (Gummer, 1975). Frameworks emphasizing the importance of cooperation and coordination among organizational members are crucial for fostering a productive research environment (Sharma et al., 2024). In this context, research management and administration professionals often transition from direct research roles, which can lead to challenges in relinquishing their previous identities and adopting new administrative responsibilities (Knee, 2014). The ambiguity surrounding the roles of research management and administration professionals may stem from the diverse skill sets required, encompassing scientific knowledge, project management, and regulatory compliance (Abadi et al., 2020).

Exploring the establishment of research management and administration necessitates the application of sociological frameworks that elucidate the intricate interplay between practitioners, professionalization endeavors, and the influence of external expertise (Christensen et al., 2018).

Free version has a limitation in the word counts. Pricing satarts from 1442JPN/month when yearly paid. It helps you write sentences one by one.

SciSpace.com

Query: How do existing professional sociological frameworks for occupational establishment apply to the emerging field of research management and administration?

Answer from top 20 papers:

Application of Sociological Frameworks to Research Management and Administration

The emerging field of Research Management and Administration (RMA) is increasingly adopting established sociological frameworks for occupational establishment. These frameworks, which guide the development and recognition of professions, are crucial for RMA as it seeks to define its role, standards, and professional identity. Below is an analysis of how these frameworks apply to RMA, drawing from the provided research papers.

1. Professional Associations and Development Frameworks

Professional associations play a pivotal role in the establishment and recognition of any occupation. In RMA, associations such as the UK’s Association of Research Managers and Administrators (ARMA) and the Southern African Research and Innovation Management Association (SARIMA) have developed Professional Development Frameworks (PDFs) to guide the profession. These frameworks outline the skills, knowledge, and behaviors required for RMAs at different career stages, from operational to leadership levels. For instance, ARMA’s PDF includes 21 functions grouped under seven broader headings, providing a structured approach to professional development (Romanò et al., 2023).

2. Competency Frameworks and Professional Recognition

Competency frameworks are essential for defining the scope and requirements of a profession. SARIMA’s Professional Competency Framework (PCF) for Southern Africa is a prime example, developed through extensive stakeholder engagement and research. The PCF identifies nine competency areas and three levels of operation, providing a benchmark for professionalization. This framework has been instrumental in establishing professional recognition programs, such as the International Professional Recognition Council (IPRC), which offers designations like Research Administrator Professional (RAP) and Senior Research Management Professional (SRMP) (Dyason & Pillay, 2023).

3. Professional Identity and Role Evolution

The evolution of professional identity in RMA is a dynamic process. As highlighted in Paper 4, RMAs often navigate a “third space” between academic and administrative roles, leading to a blended or hybrid professional identity. This identity is shaped by the changing landscape of higher education, where RMAs are increasingly expected to manage complex tasks, facilitate collaboration, and meet the demands of funders and governments. The shift from administrative to managerial roles, influenced by neoliberalism and academic capitalism, further complicates the professional identity of RMAs (Yang-Yoshihara et al., 2023).

4. Professionalization Challenges and Strategies

Despite the progress made, RMA faces challenges in achieving full professional recognition. The lack of a unified definition of RMA roles and the diversity of career paths into the profession contribute to this challenge. As noted in Paper 3, many RMAs enter the field unintentionally, often transitioning from research or administrative roles. This labyrinthine career path underscores the need for structured professional development programs and clear career progression pathways (Poli et al., 2023).

5. The Role of Professional Associations in Shaping Identity

Professional associations are not only developers of frameworks but also play a crucial role in shaping the collective identity of RMAs. For example, SARIMA’s efforts to professionalize RMA in Southern Africa have been supported by strategic partnerships and funding opportunities. These associations provide training, networking, and advocacy, fostering a sense of community and shared purpose among RMAs. However, the impact of these associations varies by region, with some areas benefiting more from well-established networks while others face challenges in gaining traction (Dyason & Pillay, 2023).

6. Gender Dynamics and Professional Visibility

The RMA profession is predominantly female, with 77% of research administrators identifying as female. This gendered nature of the profession raises questions about visibility and recognition, as female-dominated fields often face challenges in gaining the same level of professional acknowledgment. The invisibility of RMA roles within higher education institutions further exacerbates this issue, highlighting the need for greater advocacy and recognition of the profession’s contributions (Yang-Yoshihara et al., 2023).

7. Future Directions for RMA Professionalization

The future of RMA professionalization lies in addressing the complexities of its evolving identity and the diversity of its roles. This includes fostering a stronger sense of community, developing more robust professional frameworks, and advocating for greater recognition of the profession. As RMA continues to grow and adapt to the changing higher education landscape, the active participation of practitioners in shaping their professional identity will be crucial for advancing the field (Yang-Yoshihara et al., 2023).

8. Conclusion

The application of sociological frameworks to RMA highlights the profession’s progress in establishing itself as a recognized field. Through the development of professional associations, competency frameworks, and recognition programs, RMA is laying the groundwork for a structured and acknowledged profession. However, challenges such as the labyrinthine career paths, gendered dynamics, and the need for greater visibility must be addressed to ensure the continued growth and professionalization of RMA.

Papers (10) Insights
Book Chapter•10.1108/978-1-80382-701-820231029
1. Professional Associations and Professional Development Frameworks
Valentina Romanò, Adele Del Bello, Annalisa Albanesi
29 Nov 2023
Existing professional sociological frameworks for occupational establishment can guide the emerging field of research management and administration (RMA) by providing structured pathways for professional development. These frameworks help identify essential skills, knowledge, and behaviors required at various career levels—operational, management, and leadership. They also assist in defining job descriptions, facilitating training programs, and promoting recognition of RMA as a profession, ultimately paving the way for formal accreditation and enhancing the profession’s visibility and maturity within the research ecosystem.
Book Chapter•10.1108/978-1-80382-701-820231026
2. Professionalisation of Research Management and Administration in Southern Africa – A Case Study
Karin Dyason, Priyen Pillay
29 Nov 2023
Existing professional sociological frameworks for occupational establishment can inform the emerging field of research management and administration (RMA) by providing structured approaches to defining roles, competencies, and professional recognition. The Southern African Research and Innovation Management Association (SARIMA) utilized a contextualized Professional Competency Framework (PCF) to unify RMAs, drawing from established frameworks like those from the UK. This approach helps in identifying key competencies, facilitating training, and establishing professional recognition pathways, thereby enhancing the credibility and development of RMA as a profession.
Book Chapter•10.1108/978-1-80382-701-820231013
3. Research Management as Labyrinthine – How and Why People Become and Remain Research Managers and Administrators Around the World
Susi Poli, Simon Kerridge, Patrice Ajai-Ajagbe 
29 Nov 2023
Existing professional sociological frameworks for occupational establishment apply to research management and administration (RMA) by highlighting criteria such as the promotion of advanced qualifications, the establishment of professional associations, and the development of an academic voice for the community. While RMA is still debated as a definitive profession, it fulfills several criteria of professionalism, indicating a growing recognition of RMAs as a distinct occupational group within higher education management, thus supporting their professional identity and development.
Book Chapter•10.1108/978-1-80382-701-820231025
4. Evolution of Professional Identity in Research Management and Administration
Mariko Yang-Yoshihara, Susi Poli, Simon Kerridge
29 Nov 2023
Existing professional sociological frameworks for occupational establishment, such as those addressing identity as a dynamic process, apply to research management and administration (RMA) by highlighting the evolving roles and expectations of RMAs. These frameworks emphasize the importance of recognizing the multiplicity of identities within the profession, as RMAs navigate between academic and administrative spheres. This perspective encourages self-exploration and introspection among practitioners, fostering a deeper understanding of their roles and contributing to the ongoing development of the RMA profession.
•Journal Article
5. Research Administration and Management
Jennifer Shambrook, S. Marie Cooper
1 Apr 2006–The journal of research administration
The paper does not specifically address existing professional sociological frameworks for occupational establishment in relation to research management and administration. However, it emphasizes the role of research administrators as leaders and advocates within their institutions, suggesting that established frameworks could inform their development and practices. The book provides a comprehensive guide for enhancing research support structures, which may align with sociological principles of organizational behavior and professional identity in emerging fields like research management.
6. Scaling up Professionalization of Research Management in Southern Africa.
Charmaine Williamson, Karin Dyason, Jose Jackson
1 Jan 2020–The journal of research administration
Journal Article•10.33873/2686-6706.2021.16-1.47-78
7. Developing Professional Guidelines for Administrators and Heads of Research at Research Organisations
Natalya Koroleva, Elena Shlyakhovaya
1 Mar 2021
The paper discusses the development of professional guidelines for research organisation administrators and heads of research, emphasizing the need for effective HR policies and personnel management. Existing sociological frameworks can inform these guidelines by providing a structured approach to defining roles, responsibilities, and qualifications. By analyzing literature and expert feedback, the study aligns these frameworks with the specific requirements of research management, ensuring that they meet the evolving demands of productivity and quality in research activities.
10.7202/055788AR
8. L’émergence d’une profession : l’administration
Claude Maheu
1 Jan 1978
The paper indicates that while business occupations, including administration, have made strides towards professionalization, they lack full social recognition as professions. In Quebec, the establishment of research management and administration requires the development of managerial knowledge, formal training recognition, and a conducive social-political context. However, existing frameworks struggle to impose definitions on the field, leading to incomplete professional recognition, which is more closely tied to societal perceptions of university-level training than to the actual practice of management.
Journal Article•10.1177/0011392111419750
9. Professions, organizations and the state: Applying the sociology of the professions to the case of management consultancy:
Daniel Muzio, Ian Kirkpatrick, Matthias Kipping
20 Oct 2011–Current Sociology
The paper suggests that existing professional sociological frameworks, such as those proposed by Burrage et al. (1990), can be applied to research management and administration by examining the intricate negotiations between various actors, including training institutions, users, the state, and large organizations. These frameworks highlight how competing interests and historical contexts shape occupational settlements, influencing the professionalization process. The dynamics observed in management consulting may similarly inform the development and regulation of emerging fields like research management and administration.
Book Chapter•10.4337/9781788971966.00006
10. Mapping the emerging field of responsible management: domains, spheres, themes, and future research
Oliver Laasch, Roy Suddaby, R. Edward Freeman 
18 May 2020
The paper does not specifically address existing professional sociological frameworks for occupational establishment in relation to the emerging field of responsible management and administration. However, it highlights the need for responsible management research to evolve beyond its educational and organizational roots, suggesting that frameworks may need to adapt to encompass individual managerial agency and the dynamics of responsible management practices. This evolution could facilitate a deeper understanding of the responsible manager’s role within various occupational contexts.

samwell.ai

This seems paper-writing aid for research articles or review articles. Free version allows up to 1000 words of an article.

“How do existing professional sociological frameworks for occupational establishment apply to the emerging field of research management and administration?”

Within tens of seconds, it returned an report (PDF).

References

  1. Gottschall, Karin, Shire, Karen A.. “Understanding employment systems from a gender perspective: pitfalls and potentials of new comparative analytical frameworks” 2025, doi: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6537912.pdf
  2. Manchidi, T. E., Rwelamila, P. D.. “A State Legitimation Approach of Reserved Built Environment Professional Work – A Case for South Africa – Part 1” University of Cape Town Libraries, 2019, doi: https://core.ac.uk/download/639416268.pdf
  3. Bartlett, Jennifer, Hatcher, Caroline, Tywoniak, Stephane. “Public Relations Professional Practice And The Institutionalisation of CSR” Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., 2007, doi: https://core.ac.uk/download/10882101.pdf
  4. Hendry, John. “Business strategy and business history : a review and prospectus” 1989,
  5. D. May, Berry, Betsill, Boonstra, Bulmer, Delbridge, DiMaggio, et al.. “How do cities approach policy innovation and policy learning? A study of 30 policies in Northern Europe and North America” ‘Elsevier BV’, 2010,
  6. Ludbrook, Michael N, Mason, Christopher J, Meehan, Joanne. “Collaborative public procurement: Institutional explanations of legitimised resistance” ‘Elsevier BV’, 2016, doi: https://core.ac.uk/download/80772599.pdf
  7. Annette Bernhardt, Eileen Appelbaum, Rosemary Batt, Susan Houseman. “Domestic Outsourcing in the United States: A Research Agenda to Assess Trends and Effects on Job Quality” Center for Economic and Policy Research, 2016, doi: https://core.ac.uk/download/75784170.pdf
  8. Manchidi, T. E., Rwelamila, P. D.. “A State Legitimation Approach of Reserved Built Environment Professional Work – A Case for South Africa – Part 1” University of Cape Town Libraries, 2019, doi: https://core.ac.uk/download/639416268.pdf
  9. Haradhan Mohajan. “QUALITATIVE RESEARCH METHODOLOGY IN SOCIAL SCIENCES AND RELATED SUBJECTS” Journal of Economic Development Environment and People, 2018, 23-23. doi: https://doi.org/10.26458/jedep.v7i1.571
  10. Ashly Black, Josip Car, Claudia Pagliari, Chantelle Anandan, Kathrin Cresswell, Tomislav Bokun, Brian McKinstry, et al.. “The Impact of eHealth on the Quality and Safety of Health Care: A Systematic Overview” PLoS Medicine, 2011, e1000387-e1000387. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000387
  11. Christensen, Michael Jacob. “Expert Interventions for Democracy: The Historical and Epistemological Foundations of International Democracy” 2014, doi: https://core.ac.uk/download/77102434.pdf
  12. N/A. “European Perspectives for Public Administration” ‘Leuven University Press’, 2021, doi: https://core.ac.uk/download/478099488.pdf
  13. Lassnigg, Lorenz. “Approaches for the anticipation of skill needs in the Transitional Labour Market perspecitve: The Austrian experience” 2025, doi: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6594668.pdf
  14. Dimitrova, Sevdalina, Terziev, Venelin. “A NEW VIEW ON SOCIAL ADAPTATION OF THE MILITARY, DISCHARGED FROM MILITARY SERVICE IN BULGARIA” ‘European Scientific Institute, ESI’, 2014, doi: https://core.ac.uk/download/236412239.pdf
  15. Demanet, Jannick, Van den Broeck, Laura, Van Houtte, Mieke. “Unmet goals of tracking: within-track heterogeneity of students’ expectations for” 2015, doi: https://core.ac.uk/download/55782696.pdf
  16. N/A. “Public Administration in Ethiopia” ‘Leuven University Press’, 2021, doi: https://core.ac.uk/download/478123669.pdf

Insight

“How do existing professional sociological frameworks for occupational establishment apply to the emerging field of research management and administration?”

Scientific Summary

The application of sociological frameworks to the emerging field of research management and administration can provide valuable insights into the dynamics of occupational establishment within this context. Various sociological theories, such as life course theory, public participation frameworks, and the effort-reward imbalance model, can be instrumental in understanding the complexities of research management.

Life course theory, as explored in a study on mothers of medically fragile infants, emphasizes the significance of social ties and the critical decisions made during transitional phases. This framework can be applied to research management by highlighting how researchers navigate their careers through various stages, facing challenges that require adaptability and resilience. The concept of liminality, where individuals find themselves in transitional states, can also resonate with researchers who are establishing their roles in new or evolving research environments.
Public participation frameworks, particularly those informed by Bourdieu’s social theory, can elucidate the dynamics of stakeholder engagement in research management. A study analyzing public participation in Quebec’s healthcare system illustrates how implicit delegations of authority and symbolic struggles shape participation processes. This perspective can be crucial for research administrators aiming to foster inclusive environments that encourage collaboration among diverse stakeholders, ensuring that all voices are heard and valued.
The effort-reward imbalance model, validated in a study of university students, underscores the relationship between effort and perceived rewards in occupational settings. This model can be adapted to research management by examining how researchers perceive their contributions relative to the rewards they receive, such as funding, recognition, and career advancement. Understanding these dynamics can help administrators create supportive environments that mitigate stress and enhance productivity.
Moreover, the concept of “invisible work” in the integration of digital health innovations highlights the often-overlooked adjustments that users must make to incorporate new technologies into their workflows. This framework can be applied to research management by recognizing the behind-the-scenes efforts of researchers and administrators in adapting to new methodologies and technologies, which are essential for successful project outcomes.
In summary, existing sociological frameworks provide a rich foundation for understanding the occupational establishment in research management and administration. By applying these theories, stakeholders can better navigate the complexities of their roles, enhance collaboration, and foster environments that support both individual and collective success in research endeavors.

Citations

  1. Article Title: A Framework for a Sociological Description of the Communicative Interaction in Adults Who Stutter.
    Authors: Mancinelli JM,
    Journal: American journal of speech-language pathology 30 4
    Date: Jul 14 2021
  2. Article Title: The Sociological Perspective of Users’ Invisible Work: A Qualitative Research Framework for Studying Digital Health Innovations Integration.
    Authors: Trupia DV, Mathieu-Fritz A, Duong TA,
    Journal: Journal of medical Internet research 23 11
    Date: Nov 04 2021
  3. Article Title: THE SOCIOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK.
    Journal: Multivariate behavioral research 19 2-3
    Date: Apr 01 1984
  4. Article Title: Correlates of Sleep Duration in Early Childhood: A Systematic Review.
    Authors: Zhang Z, Sousa-Sá E, Pereira JR, Okely AD, Feng X, Santos R,
    Journal: Behavioral sleep medicine 19 3
  5. Article Title: Developing a sociological framework for dually diagnosed women.
    Authors: Palacios WR, Urmann CF, Newel R, Hamilton N,
    Journal: Journal of substance abuse treatment 17 1-2
  6. Article Title: Stigma and substance use disorders: an international phenomenon.
    Authors: Yang LH, Wong LY, Grivel MM, Hasin DS,
    Journal: Current opinion in psychiatry 30 5
    Date: Sep
  7. Article Title: The sociological framework surrounding inpatients.
    Authors: Deliège D,
    Journal: International nursing review 21 1
  8. Article Title: Sociological framework and concepts on questionnaires adopted in ICS/DD study in Yamanashi.
    Authors: Shinohara T, Sugi M,
    Journal: Shikai tenbo = Dental outlook Suppl
  9. Article Title: Place, social exchange and health: proposed sociological framework.
    Authors: Siegrist J,
    Journal: Social science & medicine (1982) 51 9
    Date: Nov
  10. Article Title: Life course theory as a framework to examine becoming a mother of a medically fragile preterm infant.
    Authors: Black BP, Holditch-Davis D, Miles MS,
    Journal: Research in nursing & health 32 1
    Date: Feb
  11. Article Title: Understanding Reciprocity Among University Students in Low-Resource Settings: Validation and Measurement Using a Mixed-Methods Approach.
    Authors: AbuAlSamen MM, El-Elimat T,
    Journal: Frontiers in public health 10
  12. Article Title: A sociological perspective on public participation in health care.
    Authors: Contandriopoulos D,
    Journal: Social science & medicine (1982) 58 2
    Date: Jan
  13. Article Title: Power in Dentistry: A Foucauldian Shift in South Korea.
    Authors: Kim J, Han DH, Song Y,
    Journal: Community dental health 39 2
    Date: May 27 2022
  14. Article Title: The Making of Clandestinity: Strategic Ignorance in Abortion Practices in Latin America.
    Authors: Freeman C, Rodríguez S,
    Journal: International feminist journal of politics 26 3
    Date: May 26 2024
  15. Article Title: Dying young, dying poor: a sociological examination of existential suffering among low-socioeconomic status patients.
    Authors: Williams BR,
    Journal: Journal of palliative medicine 7 1
    Date: Feb

 

Consensus.app

I gave the same question “How do existing professional sociological frameworks for occupational establishment apply to the emerging field of research management and administration?” to consensus.app (pro version). Here is the answer:

The application of professional sociological frameworks to the emerging field of research management and administration can be understood through several existing theories and concepts from sociology. These frameworks provide valuable insights into how new occupational fields can be established and understood within a broader social context.

Habermasian Framework in Administration

The Habermasian framework, which originates from sociology and philosophy, has been adapted for use in administration research. This framework is particularly useful for exploring communicative processes and distortions within organizations, such as those found in corporate sustainability reports. By applying this framework, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of the epistemological and methodological aspects of administration, which can be extended to research management and administration (Favoreto & Inocêncio, 2024).

Trust and Interpersonal Cooperation

The development of trust within organizations is another sociological concept that can be applied to research management. Trust is foundational for interpersonal cooperation among managers and professionals, influencing behavior and performance. Understanding the sociological underpinnings of trust can help in establishing effective management practices in research administration, fostering a collaborative environment (McAllister, 1995).

Normalization Process Theory (NPT)

Normalization Process Theory (NPT) offers a sociological framework to understand how new practices are implemented and integrated within organizational settings. This theory can be applied to research management to analyze how new administrative practices are adopted and normalized, providing a structured approach to managing change and innovation in research environments (McEvoy et al., 2014).

Neoinstitutional Framework

The neoinstitutional framework, which includes institutional logics and pillars, provides insights into how institutional contexts influence entrepreneurial processes. This framework can be adapted to research management by examining how institutional norms and regulations shape the establishment and evolution of research management as a profession (Sine et al., 2022).

Sociology of Professions

The sociology of professions, a middle-range theoretical framework, can be applied to understand the professionalization of research management. This framework helps in analyzing how different national contexts influence the development of research management practices, as seen in the comparison of bibliometric research assessment models in the Netherlands and Italy (Heinze & Jappe, 2020).

Sociological Theories in Team Research

Sociological theories related to team dynamics and collaboration can be applied to research management, particularly in the context of team-based research projects. These theories provide a framework for understanding intragroup and intergroup collaboration, which is essential for effective research administration (Weisner, 2018).

In summary, existing sociological frameworks offer valuable tools for understanding and establishing the emerging field of research management and administration. By applying these frameworks, researchers can gain insights into the social processes, trust dynamics, institutional influences, and professionalization of this field.

These papers were sourced and synthesized using Consensus, an AI-powered search engine for research. Try it at https://consensus.app

References

Favoreto, R., & Inocêncio, E. (2024). Theorizing from Habermasian notions in administration research. Cadernos EBAPE.BR. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395120220215x

McAllister, D. (1995). Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24-59. https://doi.org/10.5465/256727

McEvoy, R., Ballini, L., Maltoni, S., O’Donnell, C., Mair, F., & MacFarlane, A. (2014). A qualitative systematic review of studies using the normalization process theory to research implementation processes. Implementation Science : IS, 9, 2 – 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-9-2

Sine, W., Cordero, A., & Coles, R. (2022). Entrepreneurship Through a Unified Sociological Neoinstitutional Lens. Organization Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.1586

Heinze, T., & Jappe, A. (2020). Quantitative science studies should be framed with middle-range theories and concepts from the social sciences. Quantitative Science Studies, 1, 983-992. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00059

Weisner, M. (2018). Using Sociological Theories and Concepts in Accounting Information Systems Research: A Framework for Team Research. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting. https://doi.org/10.2308/JETA-52236

 

Elicit.com

Elicit helped me to make my question more specific. Now the quiry is “How do existing professional sociological frameworks for occupational establishment apply to the emerging field of research management and administration?” In free version, Elicit gives me top 10 relevant papers. Search takes about 5 minutes! Need to be patient.

To my surprise, Elicit was not just a serach engine but an AI agent that summarize the searched  literature into a breif review report (PDF).

References
  1. J. Huang, D. Hung (2018). Building the science of research management – What can research management learn from education research?
  2. Charmaine Williamson, K. Dyason, J. Jackson (2020). Scaling up Professionalization of Research Management in Southern Africa.
  3. Timothy N. Atkinson, Diane S. Gilleland, T. Barrett (2007). The Dimensions of Influence on Research Administrator Behavior: Toward a Theoretical Model of Research Administration as a Public Service Profession.
  4. K. Shykhnenko (2023). EVOLUTION OF THE RESEARCH MANAGER AND ADMINISTRATOR JOB AS A STAND-ALONE / SELF-CONTAINED OCCUPATION IN THE US UNIVERSITIES. Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University Journal. Рedagogical Sciences
  5. L. Shelley (2010). Research Managers Uncovered: Changing Roles and “Shifting Arenas” in the Academy.
  6. Arlette Jappe, Thomas Heinze (2021). 2.2 Jurisdiction of Bibliometrics
  7. Jacquelyn Allen-Collinson (2007). ‘Get yourself some nice, neat, matching box files!’ Research administrators and occupational identity work
  8. J. Kirkland (2008). University research management: an emerging profession in the developing world. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management
  9. D. Muzio, S. Ackroyd, J. Chanlat (2007). Redirections in the Study of Expert Labour: Established Professions and New Expert Occupations

Gemini

Write a review article paper on “How do existing professional sociological frameworks for occupational establishment apply to the emerging field of research management and administration?”

Occupational Sociology and Research Management
(1) Conduct a comprehensive literature search on established sociological frameworks for occupational establishment. Identify key theories, concepts, and models used to analyze the development and professionalization of different occupations.
(2) Define the emerging field of research management and administration. Explore its key roles, responsibilities, functions, and the types of professionals working in this area.
(3) Analyze how concepts from the identified sociological frameworks, such as professionalization, bureaucratization, division of labor, status attainment, and social capital, can be applied to understand the development and current state of research management and administration.
(4) Investigate the extent to which existing frameworks adequately explain the unique characteristics and challenges of research management and administration, considering factors like its interdisciplinary nature, connection to scientific research, and evolving role within academic and research institutions.
(5) Identify any gaps or limitations in the applicability of current sociological frameworks to the field of research management and administration. Consider if new or modified theoretical approaches might be needed to better understand its occupational establishment.
(6) Explore case studies or examples of how sociological frameworks have been used (or could be used) to analyze specific aspects of research management and administration, such as career trajectories, professional identities, or organizational structures.
(7) Synthesize the findings from the analysis and propose potential insights or modifications to existing sociological frameworks that could enhance our understanding of the occupational establishment of research management and administration.
(8) Based on the analysis, suggest future research directions for sociologists interested in studying the professionalization and development of the field of research management and administration.

ChatGPT

I thlew the same question, ”How do existing professional sociological frameworks for occupational establishment apply to the emerging field of research management and administration?” to ChatGPT (o3-mini).  The following is the answer:

This question invites us to consider how established sociological theories of professionalization and occupational establishment can shed light on a relatively new field—research management and administration—which is rapidly gaining importance in academic and research-intensive settings.

Below is an overview of key sociological frameworks and how they apply:

1. Professionalization and Occupational Closure

Framework Overview:
Sociologists like Andrew Abbott and Eliot Freidson have explored how occupations strive to establish a distinct professional identity through mechanisms such as credentialing, formal education, and the creation of regulatory bodies. Occupational closure is one such concept, where an occupation sets barriers to entry (like certifications or degrees) to protect its status and ensure quality standards.

Application to Research Management:

  • Credentialing and Standards: As research management emerges, institutions and professional bodies (such as the Association of Research Managers and Administrators or similar organizations) are developing training programs and certifications. These efforts mimic traditional professionalization routes, helping to legitimize the field.
  • Boundary Setting: By establishing standards and clear criteria for membership, research management is actively engaging in boundary work—a process where the field defines what is “inside” and “outside” its professional jurisdiction. This creates a distinct identity separate from, say, administrative support or academic research roles.

2. Social Closure and Legitimation

Framework Overview:
Social closure theory explains how groups use various mechanisms to maintain advantages over others by controlling access to resources and positions. For professions, establishing exclusive control over certain knowledge and practices can serve as a form of social closure.

Application to Research Management:

  • Institutional Legitimacy: Research management professionals are beginning to accumulate specialized knowledge (e.g., grant administration, compliance, research ethics) that is distinct from academic expertise. This emerging expertise is critical in establishing the legitimacy of the profession.
  • Exclusivity and Status: As the field develops, practices such as publishing best practices, holding conferences, and engaging in policy-making not only spread specialized knowledge but also help create a sense of exclusivity and professional status. This mirrors the way other well-established professions have historically set their boundaries and hierarchies.

3. Bureaucratic and Managerial Professionalism

Framework Overview:
The sociological literature on bureaucracy (notably by Max Weber) and subsequent adaptations in the study of managerial professionalism examines how new forms of expertise emerge in organizational contexts. This includes the negotiation of roles between “traditional” professionals (like academics) and new managerial roles.

Application to Research Management:

  • Interdisciplinary Integration: Research management and administration sit at the interface between academic research and institutional management. They borrow from bureaucratic principles (e.g., formalized procedures, accountability) while also integrating flexible, project-based management practices.
  • Role Negotiation: The evolution of research management reflects ongoing negotiations about authority within universities and research institutions. On one hand, it challenges the traditional academic model by introducing specialized managerial expertise; on the other, it must adapt to the fluid and often decentralized nature of contemporary research practices.

4. Implications and Tensions

Emerging Challenges:

  • Hybrid Identities: One key insight from applying these frameworks is that research management professionals often straddle dual identities—managers and quasi-academics. This duality creates both opportunities for innovation and tensions regarding authority and autonomy.
  • Dynamic Evolution: Unlike long-established professions, research management is still in the process of establishing its full array of norms and institutional supports. Its trajectory may involve continuous redefinition as the research ecosystem itself evolves.

Future Outlook:
As the field matures, sociological frameworks suggest that:

  • Legitimization processes (via formal credentials and professional networks) will likely intensify.
  • Boundary work will continue to refine what constitutes “legitimate” research management practice.
  • Inter-professional dynamics will play a crucial role in shaping the balance of power between research managers, academic researchers, and broader institutional administrators.

Conclusion

In summary, existing sociological frameworks for occupational establishment provide a valuable lens for understanding the evolution of research management and administration. By focusing on processes of professionalization, occupational closure, and boundary work, these frameworks help explain how this emerging field is negotiating its identity, establishing standards, and asserting legitimacy within complex institutional settings. This analysis also highlights that, while the field is on a trajectory toward professionalization, it faces unique challenges due to its hybrid role between academic and administrative domains.

Feel free to ask if you’d like to delve deeper into any of these aspects!

 

Claude

Claude 3.5 Haiku (free version) was used here with the same question, “How do existing professional sociological frameworks for occupational establishment apply to the emerging field of research management and administration? ” Here is the answer:

I’ll provide a comprehensive analysis of how traditional sociological frameworks intersect with the emerging field of research management and administration.

Sociological Perspectives on Research Management Occupational Establishment

Theoretical Frameworks of Occupational Development

1. Functionalist Perspective

The functionalist approach, pioneered by sociologists like Talcott Parsons, views occupational development as a process of social integration and specialized role formation. In the context of research management, this framework suggests:

  • Professional legitimacy emerges through:
    • Developing specialized knowledge domains
    • Creating standardized educational pathways
    • Establishing professional credentialing mechanisms
  • Research administration becomes a critical institutional function that supports knowledge production by managing complex organizational and bureaucratic processes

2. Conflict Theory Interpretation

Drawing from Max Weber and Karl Marx’s insights, conflict theory examines how power dynamics and resource allocation shape occupational establishment:

  • Research management emerges as a mediating role between:
    • Academic researchers
    • Institutional leadership
    • Funding bodies
    • Regulatory environments
  • Professional identity forms through negotiating competing institutional interests and managing resource distribution

3. Symbolic Interactionist Approach

George Herbert Mead’s symbolic interactionism provides insights into professional identity construction:

  • Professional roles are constructed through:
    • Interpersonal interactions
    • Shared linguistic practices
    • Negotiated meanings within research ecosystems
  • Research managers develop legitimacy through demonstrating:
    • Technical competence
    • Strategic understanding
    • Effective communication across disciplinary boundaries

Institutional Professionalization Processes

Credentialing and Knowledge Validation

The emergence of specialized graduate programs in research administration signals a formal institutionalization process:

  • Master’s programs in research management
  • Professional certification tracks (e.g., Certified Research Administrator)
  • Development of discipline-specific knowledge repositories
  • Creation of professional associations like the Research Administrators Certification Council (RACC)

Structural Incorporation

Organizational sociology suggests research management is becoming:

  • A distinct organizational layer
  • A recognized professional category
  • An essential infrastructure for knowledge production
  • A strategic organizational function bridging academic and administrative domains

Challenges in Occupational Establishment

Interdisciplinary Complexity

Research management confronts unique challenges:

  • Rapidly evolving technological landscapes
  • Increasing interdisciplinary research modalities
  • Complex regulatory environments
  • Shifting funding mechanisms

Professional Boundary Negotiations

The occupation continuously:

  • Defines its professional scope
  • Negotiates jurisdictional boundaries
  • Develops specialized competency frameworks
  • Adapts to emerging institutional demands

Theoretical Convergence

The occupational establishment of research management represents a sophisticated synthesis of:

  • Institutional logics
  • Professional knowledge systems
  • Organizational adaptation mechanisms
  • Strategic intermediation capabilities

Future Research Directions

Sociological inquiry should focus on:

  • Mapping professional trajectory
  • Analyzing power dynamics
  • Understanding identity formation processes
  • Examining institutional integration mechanisms

This analysis demonstrates how existing sociological frameworks—functionalist, conflict, and symbolic interactionist perspectives—provide nuanced insights into the emerging professional field of research management and administration.

The artifact explores how research management is transitioning from an ad-hoc administrative role to a sophisticated, institutionalized professional category. By examining credentialing processes, structural incorporation, and complex boundary negotiations, we can understand the sophisticated sociological dynamics underlying this emerging occupation.

Key observations include:

  • Professional legitimacy emerges through specialized knowledge development
  • Institutional power dynamics significantly shape occupational establishment
  • Interdisciplinary complexity challenges traditional professional categorization
  • Strategic intermediation becomes a core competency

The analysis suggests that research management represents a dynamic case study in contemporary occupational sociology, illustrating how professional domains emerge, negotiate identity, and become institutionalized in complex organizational environments.

 

タイトルとURLをコピーしました